Like it and follow it, don’t get lost if you know the ball!
The Lakers lost to the Celtics today at 121-125 plus. In the last round of the regular time of this game, James broke through the layup and was beaten by Tatum, but the referee missed and both sides entered the plus time.
Many bar friends asked: why didn’t the referee watch the video to determine whether there was any missed judgment on the ball?
——
Cousin inquired about the NBA official rule manual. According to the manual, even if the referee really wanted to watch the video, they had no right to check it.
The NBA Official Rules Manual stipulates that the referee can turn on the video to look back when the following situations occur:
1. When a whistle strike occurs at the last moment of any section
2. When there is a whistle attack at the last moment of any section
3. When the referee is not sure whether a foul in the game is a malicious foul
4. When conflicts occur
5. When the referee thinks there may be an error in the timing
6. The referee is not sure whether the goal or foul is two points or three points.
7. When the referee is not sure whether the goal or foul timed out
8. When the referee is not sure whether the foul is an offensive path foul
9. The referee is not sure which player should perform free throws.
10. The referee is not sure whether the basketball touched rim to determine whether to adjust the table of the game.
11. The referee has confirmed that there is a collision foul or blocking foul, but it is not sure whether it is hitting or blocking.
12. In the fourth quarter and the last two minutes of the time, the referee was not sure whether there was (attack) interference with the ball.
13. The referee is not sure whether the foul without the ball appears before the attacking player starts shooting, whether the defensive foul appears before serve, and whether the foul at the same time of the goal is a foul between both sides or an offensive foul.
14. When the referee is not sure whether the number of people on a team is correct
The above 14 cases are the premise that the referee can turn on the video review.
Returning to today’s game, this goal does not meet any of the above conditions, so the referee cannot initiate a video review.
——
In addition, in this goal, both Lakers and Celtics have used up the challenge opportunities in this game, and they can’t challenge any more.
To take a step back, even if the Lakers still have challenges at this time, they cannot challenge them.
According to the NBA Official Rules manual, coach challenges can only be used for three blow penalties:
1. The team was accused of personal foul
2. Outbound Ball Challenge
3. Interference ball and interference rim violations (the coach cannot challenge this item in the last two minutes of the regular time and overtime match, and can only be reviewed by the referee).
Today’s goal, after Tatum batters, the ball did not go out of bounds, and the referee did not play foul and interfere with the ball at all. Therefore, even if the Lakers had a chance to challenge, they could not challenge.
——
In addition to the referee’s initiative to watch the video and the coach’s challenge, NBA also allows the referee in the playback center to initiate a video review, but only in the following two cases:
1. In the first 46 minutes of the game, the playback center cannot determine whether the goal is 2 points or 3 points, and the playback center cannot determine whether the shooting foul is 2 points or 3 points.
2. In the first 46 minutes of the game, when the playback center cannot determine whether the goal timed out
——
Therefore, James was misjudged by the fighter today. According to the rules, it is really impossible to watch the video back.
Referee grab the play! The Great War of Lake Kai has been discussed frequently.